tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6384527644390171544.post4737608704652084225..comments2024-01-14T23:59:23.833+00:00Comments on Too Many Cuts: Disability Living Allowance - Lords review on TuesdayPartySpannerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15891187860810016587noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6384527644390171544.post-57312354518909841872012-01-16T16:02:00.483+00:002012-01-16T16:02:00.483+00:00The DWP has a fraud team, which not only investiga...The DWP has a fraud team, which not only investigates reports but carries out random checks. They are quite harsh (we've another post coming on that) and there's no fear they may have under estimated fraud.<br /><br />As I'm re-applying for my DLA at present, I've had to do a lot of background work to find out what exactly the questions on the form mean. For instance, I needed to frothingangryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18237907725025720853noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6384527644390171544.post-77113775957861969522012-01-16T14:58:31.935+00:002012-01-16T14:58:31.935+00:00"it seems possible that those intending on cl..."it seems possible that those intending on claiming disability benefits illegally will have an easier time 'faking' infront of an assesor"<br /><br />It's things like this that make me wonder how the government's figures for fraud can possibly be accurate. How can they know how many people have faked a condition with nondescript or controversial symptoms? And yes, the Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6384527644390171544.post-70070730709045160072012-01-16T14:35:33.726+00:002012-01-16T14:35:33.726+00:00link corrected - sorry about that!link corrected - sorry about that!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06454692337395043412noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6384527644390171544.post-61100611652821175662012-01-16T14:16:23.552+00:002012-01-16T14:16:23.552+00:00I think you should point out that 100,000 signatur...I think you should point out that 100,000 signatures isn't just an arbitrary figure---it's the number at which the petition can be considered for parliamentary debate. So it <em>needs</em> to get to 100,000.Tim Jhttp://timtfj.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6384527644390171544.post-35809170021184942892012-01-15T23:44:46.191+00:002012-01-15T23:44:46.191+00:00Here's the correct link to Pat's Petition ...Here's the correct link to Pat's Petition - http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/20968<br /><br />On facebook - its http://www.facebook.com/patsepetition<br />On twitter its @patspetition<br /><br />Thanks for the mention - the petition's got over 20,000 signatures now but we want to get to 100,000. So please do share it with your friends, colleagues and family.Pats Petitionhttp://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/20968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6384527644390171544.post-73697212646650042232012-01-15T22:44:00.379+00:002012-01-15T22:44:00.379+00:00The link at the end to
Sign Pat's Petition! ...The link at the end to <br /><br />Sign Pat's Petition! <br /><br />does not work for meAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com